Journal of Participatory Medicine

Co-production in research and healthcare, technology for patient empowerment and fostering partnership with clinicians.

Editor-in-Chief:

Amy Price, DPhil, Senior Research Scientist, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, USA


CiteScore 3.2

The JMIR Journal of Participatory Medicine is the leading peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing and disseminating science on the meaningful participation of individuals in research and care delivery, and the use of technology for patient and citizen empowerment. 

Articles focus on co-production and participatory design in research and healthcare, developing and deploying technology for patient self-care, fostering patient-clinician partnerships, improving patient and caregiver experience, and citizen science.

The journal is fully open access, supporting a global community of scientists, educators, clinicians, advocates, patients, and the public. We publish original research, reviews, viewpoints, case studies, and essays including those written by patients and caregivers. Extraordinary Lives articles highlight individuals the world has lost who served as exemplars of participatory medicine.

The journal is also the official journal of the Society for Participatory Medicine

The Journal of Participatory Medicine features a rapid and thorough peer-review process, professional copyediting, professional production of PDF, XHTML, and XML proofs (deposited in PubMed/PubMed Central). The Journal adheres to the same quality standards as all JMIR publications. 

All articles published here are also cross-listed in the Table of Contents of JMIR, the world's leading medical journal in health sciences / health services research and health informatics. 

The journal is indexed in Sherpa Romeo, DOAJ, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and EBSCO. With a CiteScore of 3.2, the Journal of Participatory Medicine is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

There are no publishing charges for unfunded research. There is a modest Article Processing Fee ($1500) in case of acceptance for grant-funded research or where authors have access to institutional open access funds, e.g., COMPACT/COPE signatories. 


 



Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Co-Design & Participatory Design

Patient engagement in research represents an evolution in how new knowledge is being created. Individuals and teams seeking to conduct research in this way want to learn how to best approach this work. Specialized training is required to ensure that these individuals and groups have the knowledge and skills to engage with and accomplish these goals. We developed an on-line training program, called Patient-Oriented Research Training & Learning - Primary Health Care (PORTL-PHC), to address this need.

|
Article Thumbnail
Patient-Accessible Health Records (including Open Notes)

Patient portals demonstrate significant potential for improving healthcare engagement but face critical adoption challenges. Disparities persist across different demographic groups, creating a digital divide in healthcare access. Targeted training strategies, particularly personalized and one-on-one approaches, show promise in increasing portal utilization. Innovative solutions, like community health workers specializing in digital navigation, offer a potential pathway to reduce enrollment barriers. The key challenge remains developing a scalable, cost-effective training model.

|
Article Thumbnail
Opinion: Viewpoints, Perspectives, and Opinion papers by patients and patient advocates (not grant supported)

This paper will view the rise of the e-patient, who is “equipped, enabled, empowered and engaged” through the lens of the evolution of successive digital technology innovations, each building on its predecessors, creating new tools for patient empowerment. We begin with the dawn of the Web and the proliferation of health websites and discuss the use of digital communication tools. We then discuss the adoption of electronic health records which enabled the rise of patient portals. This digitization of health data, along with the rapid adoption of mobile internet access and the proliferation of health-related smartphone apps, in turn, provided a platform for patients to co-produce healthcare by contributing their own health data to their self-care and healthcare. The exchange of health information between patients and providers has also been facilitated by telehealth/telemedicine technology which enables direct care delivery. The use of social networks in health, in use since the early days of the Web, has expanded since COVID, when public health authorities worldwide, as well as patients, sought the use of social media channels to get connected and share information. Most recently, artificial intelligence and large language models have emerged with yet untapped potential to provide patients with the information that could improve their understanding of their conditions and treatment options. We conclude that innovations in digital health technology have symbiotically evolved with the ascendance of the e-patient, enabling improved communication, collaboration, and coordination between patients and clinicians and forging a healthcare system that is safer and more responsive to patient needs.

|
Article Thumbnail
Patient and Public Involvement in Research

Chronic wounds affect 1-2% of the global population, and pose significant health and quality-of-life challenges for patients and caregivers. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision (CV) technologies present new opportunities for enhancing wound care, particularly through remote monitoring and patient engagement. A Digital Wound Care Solution (DWCS) that facilitates wound tracking using AI/CV was redesigned as a patient-facing mobile application to empower patients and caregivers to actively participate in wound monitoring and management.

|
Article Thumbnail
Opinion: Viewpoints, Perspectives, and Opinion papers by patients and patient advocates (not grant supported)

Clinical trial registries were designed to help patients search for potentially suitable clinical trials. When our family faced another serious cancer diagnosis, we searched multiple international clinical trial registries. Despite increasing evidence that trials designed WITH patients can be better for trial participants (eg, more relevant outcome measures, fewer burdens), it is currently impossible to search registries for these specific types of trials. In this Patient Perspective article, we make the first ‘call to action’ for clinical trial registries to include (1) a filter that allows for efficient searching for clinical trials designed with patients and (2) structured information, in plain language, on how patients were involved. We propose how these two innovations could help reduce barriers to clinical trial participation. We also highlight how new regulatory and ethical guidelines are encouraging patient involvement in trial design and we identify the benefits to many of doing so. Given the pressing need to improve clinical trial participation, we respectively call on the clinical trial community to respond to our ‘call to action’ and consider our proposed action plan. Ideally, when patients want to search for clinical trials designed with patients for patients, we should be able to find them. A plain language summary for this publication is available (Supplementary File 1).

|
Article Thumbnail
Opinion: Viewpoints, Columns, and Perspectives

The proliferation of AI mental health chatbots, such as those on platforms like OpenAI’s GPT Store and Character.AI, raises issues of safety, effectiveness, and ethical use; they also raise an opportunity for patients and consumers to ensure AI tools clearly communicate how they meet their needs. While many of these tools claim to offer therapeutic advice, their unregulated status and lack of systematic evaluation create risks for users, particularly vulnerable individuals. This viewpoint article highlights the urgent need for a standardized framework to assess and demonstrate the safety, ethics, and evidence basis of AI chatbots used in mental health contexts. Drawing on clinical expertise, research, co-design experience, and WHO guidance, the authors propose key evaluation criteria: adherence to ethical principles, evidence-based responses, conversational skills, safety protocols, and accessibility. Implementation challenges, including setting output criteria without one ‘right answer’, evaluating multi-turn conversations, and involving experts for oversight at scale, are explored. The authors advocate for greater consumer engagement in chatbot evaluation to ensure these tools address user needs effectively and responsibly, emphasizing the ethical obligation of developers to prioritize safety and a strong base in empirical evidence.

|
Article Thumbnail
Patient-Centred Outcomes Research

The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) established its Patient Registry to gather real-world data from patients with pancreatic cancer and their caregivers, related to their diagnosis, symptoms and symptom management, treatments, and more. Described here are results from version 2 of the PanCAN Registry.

|
Article Thumbnail
Editorial

Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) offer significant potential to enhance many aspects of daily life. Patients and caregivers are increasingly using AI for their own knowledge and to address personal challenges. The growth of AI has been extraordinary; however, the field is only beginning to explore its intersection with participatory medicine. For many years, the Journal of Participatory Medicine has published insights on tech-enabled patient empowerment and strategies to enhance patient-clinician relationships. This theme issue on Patient and Consumer Use of AI for Health to explore the use of AI for health from the perspective of patients and the public.

|
Article Thumbnail
Co-Design & Participatory Design

Surgical ward rounds (SWRs) are typically led by doctors, with limited involvement from key participants, including patients, family members, and bedside nurses. Despite the potential benefits of a more collaborative and person-centered approach, efforts to engage these stakeholders remain rare.

|
Article Thumbnail
Co-Design & Participatory Design

Smartphone apps can improve access to bipolar disorder (BD) care by delivering elements of effective psychological interventions, thereby promoting quality of life and reducing relapse risk and mood instability in BD. While many people with BD are interested in using publicly available mental health smartphone apps, without guidance, they risk selecting apps that are unsafe or ineffective.

|
Article Thumbnail
Patient Reported Measures and Outcomes in Participatory Medicine

Low retention and adherence increase clinical trial costs and timelines. Burdens associated with participating in a clinical trial contribute to early study termination. Electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) tools reduce participant burden by allowing remote participation, and facilitate communication between researchers and participants. The Datacubed Health (DCH) mobile application is unique among ePRO platforms in its application of behavioral science principles (reward, motivation, identity, etc.) in clinical trials to promote engagement, adherence, and retention.

|
Article Thumbnail
Patient Engagement and Empowerment

Newborn screening aims to identify babies affected by rare but serious genetic conditions. As technology advances, there is the potential to expand the newborn screening program following evaluation of the likely benefits and drawbacks. To inform these decisions, it is important to consider the family experience of screening and the views of the public. Engaging in public dialogue can be difficult. The conditions, screening processes, and associated moral and ethical considerations are complex.

|

We are working in partnership with

  • Crossref Member
  • Open Access
  • Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
  •  
  •  
  • TrendMD MemberORCID Member
  •  Society for Participatory Medicine

This journal is indexed in

  • PubMed
  • PubMed Central
  •  
  •  
  • DOAJDOAJ SealSherpa RomeoEBSCO/EBSCO Essentials

  •  
  •  
  •  

  •  
  •